At a crucial National Security Council meeting in July 1965, during which President Lyndon Johnson and his advisers were deliberating whether the United States should intervene militarily in South Vietnam with 100,000 troops, US Ambassador to South Vietnam Henry Cabot Lodge, Jr delivered the coup de grâce to those vacillating about the intervention: ‘I feel there is a greater threat to start World War III if we don’t go in [to save South Vietnam]. Can’t we see the similarity to our own indolence at Munich?’1 Thirty years later, US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright also felt it necessary to remind her interlocutors, when dealing with ethnic cleansing in the Balkans, that her ‘mindset is Munich’,2 not Vietnam. Her pro-military intervention mindset pitted her against the then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Colin Powell, whom she needled with her famous comment ‘What’s the point of having this superb military that you’re always talking about if we can’t use it?’3 Powell was so dismayed by Albright’s willingness to send US troops in harm’s way that ‘I thought I would have an aneurysm’.4
The point of departure of this article is that what Lodge and Albright were doing is unexceptional: when confronted with new challenges, they looked to the past for guidance. But as the Vietnam debacle and Powell’s reaction to Albright suggest, it is also true that looking to the past to assess the present (and future) is strewn with risks. The invocation of the Hippocratic ‘do no harm’ oath by the editors of this special issue undoubtedly applies to decision-makers predisposed to ‘learning’ and applying the lessons of history in dealing with foreign policy challenges. Scholars who have examined how policy-makers use historical analogies in international affairs agree that in most of those cases, their analogies—insofar as they shaped the decision—have led to suboptimal outcomes, or what the editors call ‘failures’.
This article attempts to do two things: first, to glean from existing studies of ‘failures’ in using the lessons of history in international affairs a set of ‘how not tos’ that can help steer the process of using history away from the wrong paths towards something better; and second, to examine the extent to which these ‘how not to’ proscriptions have informed the way policy-makers and analysts are using history in a contemporary case. I will proceed as follows. In the first part of the article, I draw on existing analyses of how policy-makers have used the ‘lessons of the past’ in their foreign policy decision-making to suggest a few ‘how not to’ proscriptions on using history.5 My survey of the existing literature on the pitfalls of analogical reasoning in international affairs leads us to four related ‘how not to’ strictures: (1) do not settle or fixate on the first or most evocative analogy that comes to mind; (2) do not dismiss differences between your favoured analogy and the case in question; (3) do not neglect alternative analogies; and (4) do not shirk from ‘testing’ the observable implications of your preferred analogy. Decision-makers who show awareness of these ‘how not tos’ in using the lessons of the past, I argue, are less likely to commit the errors that plague the unaware.
The second part of the article explores the extent to which these four ‘how not tos’ manifest themselves in a contemporary case of ‘learning from the past’. The case I have chosen is how the United States and its strategic partners are using historical analogies to interpret the nature and trajectory of US–China relations today. Research indicates that four historical analogies figure prominently in the contemporary worldwide debate about the nature and challenge posed by China’s rise: Athens–Sparta (or ‘the Thucydides Trap’), the First World War, the Second World War or Munich, and the Cold War. Of these four, the Cold War analogy is emerging as the key interpretative schema and it will be the focus of the analysis here. I shall pay special attention to how policy-makers (former and current), rather than scholars, use the analogy, because it is the use of analogies by those with policy influence, such as former US Secretaries of State Henry Kissinger and Mike Pompeo, that shapes thinking and debate in the policy sphere.
The use of the Cold War analogy is not limited to the US policy community. China’s leaders, for example, often accuse the United States of adopting a ‘Cold War mentality’ in its diplomatic approach to Asia in general, and China in particular, but they seldom spell out what that mentality involves other than to imply a hegemonic US bent on retarding China’s rise.6 Other policy-makers in Asia, Europe and Africa—as I will show below—are also latching on to the Cold War parallel to make sense of US–China relations and the implications for their respective countries and regions.7 My focus, however, will be on the analogy’s usage by the United States and its strategic partners (Australia in particular). This focus is justified by the fact that the most systematic and detailed articulations of the analogy are to be found in debates within the US. This should not come as a surprise, given that the United States (and its strategic partners in Asia) are the ones most in need of getting the ‘diagnosis’ about the nature and stakes of the China challenge right if they are to construct appropriate strategies to meet the challenge.
My analysis of how the Cold War analogy is being deployed suggests that its users have avoided the worst pitfalls of analogical reasoning in foreign affairs. The most prominent users of these historical analogies show awareness of the first three of the above proscriptions; all, however, shy away from the fourth—the need to test the prognostications of their favoured analogy. Although this is far from perfect, the signs point to the Cold War analogy being used in ways that avoid the general pattern of superficial and poor use documented in existing analyses of analogical reasoning in foreign affairs.
Authored by Yuen Foong Khong | International Affairs, Volume 98, Issue 5, September 2022 | Download the complete report from here.
Related MCQs
- Which one of the following sentences is grammatically wrong? (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
I gave Sarah a ride to work this morning.
My friend Ismail and me went to the party.
Before we left, Farah and I said goodbye to the host.
Samra accidentally hit me with her bag.Submitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- The synonym of the word \'Brazen\' is? (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
Audacious
Calm
Affable
InessentialSubmitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- The meaning of the idiom \"Talking twenty to the dozen\" is? (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
Talking too much
Talking out of turn
Talking without making any sense
Talking rapidly and without stopping.Submitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- Change the following sentence from Indirect to Direct Speech: “My friend requested me to bring him a sandwich.” (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
\"Please bring me a sandwich\", said my friend.
He said, \"My friend, please bring me a sandwich.\"
\"Please bring my friend a sandwich\", said he.
My friend said, \"Will you bring me a sandwich\".Submitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- Bakhar Fort is located in which province? (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
Sindh
Punjab
Balouchistan
Khyber PakhtunkhwaSubmitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- The synonym of the word ‘Banish’ is? (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
Abhorrent
Frank
Exile
DelightSubmitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- River Kunhar flows through the Kaghan Valley and joins which river? (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
Kabul River
Chenab River
Ravi River
Jhelum RiverSubmitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- Which of the options below correctly combines the following two sentences into a compound sentence? • The sky was clear • The Sun was setting. (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
The sky was clear while the sun was setting.
The sky was clear, for the sun was setting.
The sky was clear, and the sun was setting.
None of the given options.Submitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- The national anthem of Pakistan was officially adopted in? (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
1948
1950
1954
1952Submitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- Which article of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973 states that Islam shall be the state religion? (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
Article 3
Article 4
Article 2
Article 1Submitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- Change the following sentence from Direct to Indirect speech: He asked his teacher, \"Need I read this chapter\"? (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
He asked his teacher whether there was a need to read that chapter.
He asked his teacher whether he needed to read that chapter.
He asked his teacher if it was necessary to read this chapter.
He asked his teacher if he had to read that chapter.Submitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- Change the following sentence from Indirect to Direct speech: “The porter respectfully assured the lady that he would take care of her luggage while she bought her tickets.” (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
The porter said, “I would take care of your baggage while you buy your ticket, Madam.”
The porter said, “I will take care of your baggage while you buy your ticket, Madam.”
The porter said, “I would take care of your baggage while you bought your ticket, Madam.”
The porter said to the lady, “I would take care of your baggage while you bought your ticket.”Submitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- Harappa is located on the banks of which river? (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
Sutlej River
Chenab River
Ravi River
Indus RiverSubmitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- The antonym of the word “Hapless” is? (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
Countless
Fortunate
Woeful
IntensitySubmitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- The largest division of Pakistan in terms of its area is? (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
Malakand, KPK
Bahawalpur, Punjab
Rakhshan, Balochistan
Hyderabad, SindhSubmitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- Change the voice of the following sentence: Rain disrupted the last day’s play between Pakistan and Australia. (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
The last day’s play of Pakistan and Australia was disrupted by rain.
Pakistan and Australia’s play of the last day as disrupted by rain.
The last day’s play between Pakistan and Australia was disrupted by rain.
The last day’s play between Pakistan and Australia were disrupted by rain.Submitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- The meaning of the idiom \'Make a beeline\' is? (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
Go straight to
Stand in a queue
Look for freebies
Put the bees in lineSubmitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- The antonym of the word “Dwindle” is? (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
Decay
Calculate
Increase
SupportSubmitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- British Viceroy who was considered the architect of the Partition of Bengal? (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
Lord Canning
Lord Dufferin
Lord Minto
Lord CurzonSubmitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- The study of the relationship between environment and organism is? (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
Gerontology
Ecology
Lithography
EntomologySubmitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- Change the following sentence from Direct to Indirect speech: The doctor said to the patient, \"How do you feel now\"? Has the pain gone down\"? (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
The doctor asked the patient how he was feeling then and if the pain was down.
The doctor asked the patient how he felt then and if the pain had gone down.
The doctor asked the patient how he had felt when the pain was gone.
The doctor asked the patient how he is feeling now and if the pain has gone down.Submitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- Change the voice of the following sentence: Can those happy moments be ever forgotten by me? (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
Shall I ever forget those happy moments?
Can I ever forget those happy moments?
Will I ever forget those happy moments?
Could I ever forget those happy moments?Submitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- Hear & See, Flower & Flour, Sell & Cell are the examples of? (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
Homophone
Homograph
Eggcorn
OxymoronSubmitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- The _________ reply of my sister conveyed the clear message that she was not happy with me. (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
Vivacious
Sinuous
Gentle
TerseSubmitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team
- Choose the complex sentence out of the given options. (CCE 2023 Screening Test, December 1, 2024)
I will give you your present after you eat your dinner.
He did not wait to go to the party, yet he went anyway.
The bridge is very long.
None of the options.Submitted by: CSS Exam Desk Team